Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press S or / to search in the book

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Challenge 31: Verify the safety of BinaryHeap functions

  • Status: Open
  • Solution: Option field to point to the PR that solved this challenge.
  • Tracking Issue: #746
  • Start date: 2026/11/03
  • Reward: TBD

Goal

Verify the safety of BinaryHeap functions in binary_heap/mod.rs.

Motivation

BinaryHeap is the priority queue of the standard library. To keep its elements in heap order, it moves them with raw pointer reads and copies, at positions chosen by comparing elements with Ord. Ord is safe code written by users and can return any result, so these moves must be safe even when the comparisons are inconsistent.

Description

This challenge verifies the safety of BinaryHeap's sift functions, PeekMut, the TrustedLen sorted iterators, and the safe methods built on them. The sifts move elements through Hole, which reads one element out with ptr::read, copies others into the gap with ptr::copy_nonoverlapping at positions chosen by Ord, and writes the element back in Drop. PeekMut shrinks the length to 1 while a &mut T to the top element is out.

The other unsafe impls on IntoIter (TrustedFused, SourceIter, InPlaceIterable, AsVecIntoIter) delegate to vec::IntoIter and are out of scope for this challenge.

Assumptions

  • Vec's implementation may be assumed correct, and its existing verified contracts may be reused.
  • A panicking Ord is out of scope: solutions need not verify unwinding through Drop for Hole.

Success Criteria

Write and prove the contract for the safety of the following unsafe functions:

Function
Hole::new
Hole::get
Hole::move_to
sift_up
sift_down_range
sift_down
sift_down_to_bottom

Prove that the following implementations of the unsafe trait TrustedLen are correct, that is, that size_hint returns the exact number of remaining elements:

Implementation
TrustedLen for IntoIterSorted
TrustedLen for DrainSorted

Prove the absence of undefined behavior for the following safe abstractions:

Function
push
pop
peek_mut
PeekMut::deref
PeekMut::deref_mut
PeekMut::pop
PeekMut::refresh
Drop for PeekMut
rebuild
rebuild_tail
append
into_sorted_vec
From<Vec>
IntoIterSorted::next
DrainSorted::next
Drop for Hole

peek_mut must also be safe when the PeekMut is leaked after deref_mut (for example with mem::forget): the heap keeps length 1 and later operations on the heap must remain safe. Leaking the other elements is acceptable.

The unsafe functions from_raw_vec and as_mut_slice require callers to keep the contents a max-heap. This is a correctness requirement, not a safety one, so the functions above must be safe even when the contents are not a max-heap.

The verification must be unbounded---it must hold for heaps of arbitrary length.

For zero-sized T, heaps can exceed isize::MAX elements and the child-index arithmetic in the sift loops can overflow (see the FIXME in sift_down_range). An overflow panic there is acceptable.

The verification must hold for generic type T (what satisfies this clause is to be decided in issue #734).

The verification must hold for any implementation of Ord for T, including ones that return inconsistent results.

List of UBs

All proofs must automatically ensure the absence of the following undefined behaviors ref:

  • Accessing (loading from or storing to) a place that is dangling or based on a misaligned pointer.
  • Invoking undefined behavior via compiler intrinsics.
  • Reading from uninitialized memory except for padding or unions.
  • Producing an invalid value

Note: All solutions to verification challenges need to satisfy the criteria established in the challenge book in addition to the ones listed above.